HB 1044
Civil Remedies for Immigration Enforcement Rights Violations
Gives Georgia residents the right to sue civil immigration enforcement officers who violate their constitutional rights during enforcement operations.
Issue Brief // Warrants & Due Process
I support public safety and enforcing the law. I also believe every agency must follow the Constitution. This page is about protecting Georgia families from warrantless intrusion, unidentified enforcement, and federal power operating with too little transparency and too little judicial oversight. Immigration enforcement is one major example, but the principle is broader: if any federal agency can ignore rights in one neighborhood today, it can ignore yours tomorrow.
Rights do not disappear just because a federal agency says they are inconvenient.

Your Home
No Georgia citizen should have to wonder whether armed agents can show up at a home, conceal their identity, and treat a judicial warrant like a technicality.
Due Process
Agencies without transparency and accountability do not stay limited. Clear rules protect families, officers, and public trust.
State Duty
Georgia has a duty to defend its residents by requiring warrants, visible authority, public reporting, and clear rules before state resources support federal enforcement.
Find Your Issue Fast
If you came here looking for one specific concern, start here. These are the main ways warrants, due process, and federal enforcement show up in real life for Georgia families.
Federal agencies should not be able to treat your home like a place they can enter first and justify later.
These should not become routine enforcement zones without a judicial warrant.
ICE and any other armed agents exercising power should identify themselves clearly so the public can verify who is acting under government authority.
The state should not fund or expand federal detention infrastructure without transparency, oversight, and clear public accountability.
Anyone calling themselves a leader should be able to put constitutional limits ahead of party pressure when the two conflict.
Summary
Georgia citizens should not lose their basic rights because a federal agency decides speed matters more than the Constitution. Federal enforcement should be measured against clear standards: homes require judicial warrants, armed agents identify themselves, state resources need explicit authorization, and schools, hospitals, churches, libraries, and shelters should not become routine enforcement sites without a judge signing off.
The core principle is simple: federal power does not cancel the rights of the people who live here. When ICE or any other agency hides badges, pressures local systems, or seeks new detention infrastructure backed by Georgia money and roads, Georgia should require transparency, oversight, and a clear public purpose.
A state representative cannot rewrite federal immigration law, but Georgia can refuse to be a passive partner in constitutional abuse. Georgia can insist on warrants, transparency, location limits, and political accountability. Georgia can stop subsidizing detention expansion. Georgia can refuse to turn every public institution into an extension of federal enforcement.
Leadership matters here too. Anyone who wants to call themselves a leader should be able to put constitutional limits ahead of party pressure. We need more of that in Georgia, especially when public safety, local resources, and basic rights all intersect.
Protecting rights is not anti-law-enforcement. It is pro-Constitution, pro-family, and pro-Georgia.
Homes and Warrants
If armed agents want to force entry into a home, a judicial warrant should be the baseline. Georgia citizens should not have to guess whether federal agents can bypass the spirit of the Fourth Amendment with administrative shortcuts.
Sensitive Locations
People go to these places for education, worship, care, safety, and survival. Turning them into routine enforcement locations chills basic community life and makes vulnerable people less likely to seek help.
Transparency
When government agents show up armed, masked, or without visible identification, public trust collapses and abuse becomes easier to hide. Power should never be anonymous.
Georgia's Role
A state representative cannot rewrite federal immigration law, but Georgia can require transparency before funding detention expansion, protect state accountability, and set clear rules before state resources are used to support federal operations.
Leadership
Anyone who calls themselves a leader should be able to stand by their principles when party pressure points the other way. If constitutional limits only matter when your side is out of power, they are not really principles.
Bills To Watch
These are the bills on this site tied to ICE, warrants, transparency, state authorization, and detention expansion. The full tracker collects them with the rest of the platform's bill list in one place.
Agent transparency
Identification and accountability when federal immigration agents exercise public authority.
HB 1044
Gives Georgia residents the right to sue civil immigration enforcement officers who violate their constitutional rights during enforcement operations.
SB 389
Requires all covered immigration enforcement officers to wear clearly visible identification badges during public enforcement activities. Currently stalled in Senate Public Safety committee.
SB 397
Senate companion to HB 1044. Creates a state tort pathway for residents to seek damages when civil immigration officers violate their constitutional rights. Both bills filed in January 2026 and pending in committee.
State authorization
When Georgia resources can and cannot support federal immigration operations.
HB 1053
Repeals existing laws requiring Georgia local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities, restoring local jurisdictions' ability to set policing priorities.
SB 390
Bars the Georgia National Guard and other armed state forces from participating in federal immigration enforcement operations without explicit authorization from the Governor.
Sensitive locations
Protections for schools, churches, hospitals, libraries, and shelters.
HB 470
Forbids immigration arrests, detentions, and searches at schools, houses of worship, healthcare facilities, and other sensitive community spaces.
HB 1050
Bars local schools and school districts from sharing student data with federal immigration authorities without clear legal authority.
SB 391
Prohibits federal immigration agents from entering schools, hospitals, churches, libraries, and domestic violence shelters without a judicially signed warrant.
Detention expansion
Detention-facility growth, funding, oversight, and Georgia infrastructure support.
HB 1401
Requires third-party health, safety, and civil rights audits of any Georgia facility housing federal immigration detainees.
SB 517
Imposes a two-year moratorium on new immigration detention facilities in Georgia.
SB 549
Cuts off Georgia state funding, tax incentives, and public infrastructure support for ICE immigration detention centers.
References
Example Issues In The News
A 2026 lawsuit argues ICE policy unlawfully lets agents enter homes using administrative warrants instead of warrants signed by a judge.
Read articleFaith groups challenged immigration enforcement actions in houses of worship, highlighting the broader fight over whether sensitive locations should stay protected.
Read articleNPR outlined how policy changes reopened the question of whether schools and churches can become part of routine immigration enforcement activity.
Read articleThe case challenges suspicionless stops, warrantless arrests, and racial profiling tied to ICE and CBP operations in Minnesota.
Read article